<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpsMgr Command Shell Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pavleck.net/2009/05/opsmgr-command-shell-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2009/05/opsmgr-command-shell-performance/</link>
	<description>System Center, PowerShell, Windows and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Delamarter</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2009/05/opsmgr-command-shell-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Delamarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pavleck.net/?p=284#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Just to close the loop on this Lincoln found a great way to work around this if you are using PowerShell v2 to run the command shell in.  He posted those details to http://blogs.technet.com/momteam/archive/2009/12/09/slow-tab-expansion-in-ops-mgr-powershell-v2-console.aspx.

In the next release we&#039;re looking at doing away with the provider altogether so this problem should go away moving forward.

Thanks again for bringing this to our attention!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to close the loop on this Lincoln found a great way to work around this if you are using PowerShell v2 to run the command shell in.  He posted those details to <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/momteam/archive/2009/12/09/slow-tab-expansion-in-ops-mgr-powershell-v2-console.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.technet.com/momteam/archive/2009/12/09/slow-tab-expansion-in-ops-mgr-powershell-v2-console.aspx</a>.</p>
<p>In the next release we&#8217;re looking at doing away with the provider altogether so this problem should go away moving forward.</p>
<p>Thanks again for bringing this to our attention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpavleck</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2009/05/opsmgr-command-shell-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>jpavleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pavleck.net/?p=284#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Yup, I was doing it that way, typing Get-&lt;tab&gt; and that was taking forever and a day to complete. Seems like it&#039;s pretty dependent on the size of the network. I&#039;d been talking to people about it for awhile to make sure it wasn&#039;t just me before I bugged it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, I was doing it that way, typing Get-<tab> and that was taking forever and a day to complete. Seems like it&#8217;s pretty dependent on the size of the network. I&#8217;d been talking to people about it for awhile to make sure it wasn&#8217;t just me before I bugged it.</tab></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniele Muscetta</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2009/05/opsmgr-command-shell-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniele Muscetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pavleck.net/?p=284#comment-106</guid>
		<description>your comment form is stripping out brachets, I should have imagined it...
what I really wrote was something like: if you type GET and hit TAB immediately, it takes ages....
if you type GET- and then hit TAB...
hope this makes it clearer :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your comment form is stripping out brachets, I should have imagined it&#8230;<br />
what I really wrote was something like: if you type GET and hit TAB immediately, it takes ages&#8230;.<br />
if you type GET- and then hit TAB&#8230;<br />
hope this makes it clearer <img src='http://www.pavleck.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniele Muscetta</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2009/05/opsmgr-command-shell-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniele Muscetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pavleck.net/?p=284#comment-105</guid>
		<description>if what you are trying to auto-complete a cmdlet name, you need to reach the &quot;-&quot; dash sign.

So if you type GET -THIS will take ages, because yes, it is searching for a file on the current drive FIRST - which in ops mgr is an object, since the drive is a provider... and it is a SQL query at the end of the chain.

But if you type Get- &lt;&lt;-- see? you actually include the &quot;-&quot; that separates VERB from NOUN in a cmdlet, THEN it is fast, as it will search in cmdlets FIRST.

Try it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if what you are trying to auto-complete a cmdlet name, you need to reach the &#8220;-&#8221; dash sign.</p>
<p>So if you type GET -THIS will take ages, because yes, it is searching for a file on the current drive FIRST &#8211; which in ops mgr is an object, since the drive is a provider&#8230; and it is a SQL query at the end of the chain.</p>
<p>But if you type Get- &lt;&lt;&#8211; see? you actually include the &#8220;-&#8221; that separates VERB from NOUN in a cmdlet, THEN it is fast, as it will search in cmdlets FIRST.</p>
<p>Try it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

