<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Resolution States to fine tune alert notifications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/</link>
	<description>System Center, PowerShell, Windows and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jeremy.  While I was teaching myself just enough PowerShell to get this done, I discovered mapping email addresses back to a resolution state with &quot;switch&quot; was a little much.  Here&#039;s the script I&#039;m using now with small-scale success (most remarks removed):

#----
$resState = 0
$RMS = &quot;yourrmshere&quot;

Add-PSSnapin &quot;Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Client&quot;
Set-Location &quot;OperationsManagerMonitoring::&quot;
New-ManagementGroupConnection -ConnectionString:$RMS
Set-Location $RMS

$momapi = New-Object -comObject &quot;MOM.ScriptAPI&quot;

# Gather all the alerts in ‘new’ state and with CustomField 10 in the range required
$alerts = Get-Alert &#124; Where-Object {$_.ResolutionState -eq 0 -and {$_.CustomField10 -gt 50 -and $_.CustomField10 -lt 200}}

# Now that we have our alerts, lets change the resolution state to equal the custom field.
foreach ($alert in $alerts) {
# Change resolution state
if ($alert.CustomField10 -gt 0 -and $alert.CustomField10 -lt 255)
{$alert.ResolutionState = $alert.CustomField10
# Update the RMS
$alert.Update(&quot;&quot;)}
}
#----

I&#039;ve created several custom resolution states, like 52=Messaging Team, 53=Applications Team, etc..  Any custom rules or monitors beyond the Exchange MP can have CustomField10 set to 52, then a subscription filtered for the &quot;Messaging Team&quot; resolution state delivers only those alerts to them.  I think I can also use the severity flags to determine whether a subscription goes to pager, email, or just IM.

Thanks again for a great solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jeremy.  While I was teaching myself just enough PowerShell to get this done, I discovered mapping email addresses back to a resolution state with &#8220;switch&#8221; was a little much.  Here&#8217;s the script I&#8217;m using now with small-scale success (most remarks removed):</p>
<p>#&#8212;-<br />
$resState = 0<br />
$RMS = &#8220;yourrmshere&#8221;</p>
<p>Add-PSSnapin &#8220;Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Client&#8221;<br />
Set-Location &#8220;OperationsManagerMonitoring::&#8221;<br />
New-ManagementGroupConnection -ConnectionString:$RMS<br />
Set-Location $RMS</p>
<p>$momapi = New-Object -comObject &#8220;MOM.ScriptAPI&#8221;</p>
<p># Gather all the alerts in ‘new’ state and with CustomField 10 in the range required<br />
$alerts = Get-Alert | Where-Object {$_.ResolutionState -eq 0 -and {$_.CustomField10 -gt 50 -and $_.CustomField10 -lt 200}}</p>
<p># Now that we have our alerts, lets change the resolution state to equal the custom field.<br />
foreach ($alert in $alerts) {<br />
# Change resolution state<br />
if ($alert.CustomField10 -gt 0 -and $alert.CustomField10 -lt 255)<br />
{$alert.ResolutionState = $alert.CustomField10<br />
# Update the RMS<br />
$alert.Update(&#8220;&#8221;)}<br />
}<br />
#&#8212;-</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve created several custom resolution states, like 52=Messaging Team, 53=Applications Team, etc..  Any custom rules or monitors beyond the Exchange MP can have CustomField10 set to 52, then a subscription filtered for the &#8220;Messaging Team&#8221; resolution state delivers only those alerts to them.  I think I can also use the severity flags to determine whether a subscription goes to pager, email, or just IM.</p>
<p>Thanks again for a great solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy D. Pavleck</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy D. Pavleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve,
 Using email addresses won&#039;t work so well, as it&#039;s not a simple matter to cause a notification to occur in response to an alert. A custom resolution state in a custom field would work well though - and a PS switch -match statement would be great.
In fact I have an expanded script that matches alert names based on a switch statement, and it does great as long as there aren&#039;t a lot of alerts in the pipeline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve,<br />
 Using email addresses won&#8217;t work so well, as it&#8217;s not a simple matter to cause a notification to occur in response to an alert. A custom resolution state in a custom field would work well though &#8211; and a PS switch -match statement would be great.<br />
In fact I have an expanded script that matches alert names based on a switch statement, and it does great as long as there aren&#8217;t a lot of alerts in the pipeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking of a twist on this that uses either email addresses or just the customized resolution state value in a Custom Field.  The script could grab the value in the Custom Field of your choice, and either change the resolution state to equal the Custom Field, or compare it to a lookup list (like a PS &quot;switch&quot; statement), then map the resolution state to a specific subscription.

Still trying to map it out in my head, and I&#039;m not sure I know enough PowerShell to do it myself...  Does this sound feasible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking of a twist on this that uses either email addresses or just the customized resolution state value in a Custom Field.  The script could grab the value in the Custom Field of your choice, and either change the resolution state to equal the Custom Field, or compare it to a lookup list (like a PS &#8220;switch&#8221; statement), then map the resolution state to a specific subscription.</p>
<p>Still trying to map it out in my head, and I&#8217;m not sure I know enough PowerShell to do it myself&#8230;  Does this sound feasible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy D. Pavleck</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy D. Pavleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-35</guid>
		<description>bah! 5 mins, I&#039;ll fix this.



&amp;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bah! 5 mins, I&#8217;ll fix this.</p>
<p>&amp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy D. Pavleck</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy D. Pavleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Ethan,
 If you look in the screenshot you can see what I mean, it&#039;s the HTML code for &amp;, which is &lt;pre&gt; &amp;&lt;/pre&gt; instead of &amp;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan,<br />
 If you look in the screenshot you can see what I mean, it&#8217;s the HTML code for &#038;, which is
<pre> &amp;</pre>
<p> instead of &</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Froese</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Froese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-33</guid>
		<description>What does the following mean in your instructions?

&quot;Configure the command line execution settings as shown - remembering to use “&amp;” instead of “&amp;”.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the following mean in your instructions?</p>
<p>&#8220;Configure the command line execution settings as shown &#8211; remembering to use “&amp;” instead of “&amp;”.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy D. Pavleck</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy D. Pavleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Hi John,
 That&#039;s a typo in the script regarding the resolution state. Should be $alert.ResolutionState = $resState, I&#039;ll have to fix that. One of the problems of testing something then trying to just edit it so you can publish it.

I&#039;m not quite understanding your question in your first post - except that the correction listed in the comments for #14 are correct, if you look at the screenshot you can see what I was trying to say. If you&#039;re having further questions, contact me at jeremy at pavleck dot net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,<br />
 That&#8217;s a typo in the script regarding the resolution state. Should be $alert.ResolutionState = $resState, I&#8217;ll have to fix that. One of the problems of testing something then trying to just edit it so you can publish it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite understanding your question in your first post &#8211; except that the correction listed in the comments for #14 are correct, if you look at the screenshot you can see what I was trying to say. If you&#8217;re having further questions, contact me at jeremy at pavleck dot net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Just one more Q....
Do the lines in the PS script have to agree in value (Below they both have a value of 10? So if I change the Alert Resolution state to 1, then both lines should be 1 in the script?
Thx
JB

$resState = 10 # Our custom resolution state

$alert.ResolutionState = 10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Just one more Q&#8230;.<br />
Do the lines in the PS script have to agree in value (Below they both have a value of 10? So if I change the Alert Resolution state to 1, then both lines should be 1 in the script?<br />
Thx<br />
JB</p>
<p>$resState = 10 # Our custom resolution state</p>
<p>$alert.ResolutionState = 10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Thx for this. Looks good.
I am still having trouble generating an e-mail alert from this. If I have a subscription to send an email on any windows 2003 server critical event, then I get an e-mail for this alert, but using the specific criterial listed above I receive no email alert, even though SCOM has registered the critical alert.
I did notice that someone queried a typo in Point 14 above. Is the line correct in the main body of the text above, or should it be amended?
Thx,
JB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Thx for this. Looks good.<br />
I am still having trouble generating an e-mail alert from this. If I have a subscription to send an email on any windows 2003 server critical event, then I get an e-mail for this alert, but using the specific criterial listed above I receive no email alert, even though SCOM has registered the critical alert.<br />
I did notice that someone queried a typo in Point 14 above. Is the line correct in the main body of the text above, or should it be amended?<br />
Thx,<br />
JB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: System Center Forum - Tip: Four ways to target notifications to a more granular level OpsMgr and Essentials 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.pavleck.net/2008/07/using-resolution-states-to-fine-tune-alert-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>System Center Forum - Tip: Four ways to target notifications to a more granular level OpsMgr and Essentials 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavleck.net/?p=61#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] As you will see, there&#8217;s a lot of flexibility in this method, although it takes some work. As Jeremy Pavleck mentions, you have 254 possible resolution states that can be used to in a Notification [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As you will see, there&#8217;s a lot of flexibility in this method, although it takes some work. As Jeremy Pavleck mentions, you have 254 possible resolution states that can be used to in a Notification [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

